* FOURNIER, Pierre(24th Jun. 1906 ~ 8th Jan. 1986) [ Prince of the cello ] Pierre Fournier is a member of glorious school of French cellists in 20th century after Casals - from Paul Bazelaire and Maurice Maréchal, Fournier, Tortelier, Navara, and Gendron - and perhaps most famous in them. He is almost incarnation of 'gracefulness' used in depicting French players, called 'Prince of the cello'. What a good and enviable nickname! He was
born in Paris as a son of army general, from a musical
family(His brother Jean is also a famous violinist, whose
wife is Jeanette Doyen - Jean Doyen's sister. He made
trio team with Badura-Skoda and Antonio Janigro and recorded many trio repertoires
at Westminster label). He learned piano, but suffered
from polio and changed to cello at nine because he had
problems in pedaling from the aftereffects of it. He was
taught from 1918 by André Hekking, later famous teacher Paul
Bazelaire in Paris Conservatoire. He graduated at the
first prize in 1923, making début
next year in Paris. He became solist of Colonne Orchestra
on Jan. 1927, starting concert tour in Europe. Invited by
Berlin Philharmonic in 1933 he went to Germany, which
established his international fame. Maybe he knew Furtwängler
at this time, and broadcast recording of Dvorák concerto
2nd mvt.(1942; more or less dubious) and Schumann
concerto 3rd mvt. remained. His artistry was 'deriving most of gracefulness of the work he played'. His tone and musical fluence is never hard, and so fluent that I usually come to forget it is very difficult to play cello like him. But his beautiful tone does never spoil the whole musical span, which shows his supreme experience and musicality. Listening to Casals I realize his humanity and deep concentration on the essence of the works he thought to be, and to Rostropovich I am moved by his overwhelming technique, power, and vast scale. Fournier always has me consider again how beautiful the works are. Obviously, difficult to judge which of the two player is better, I think Fournier is somewhat better than Rostropovich in the recordings from baroque to classical era. The latter often shows some disaccord to his partners, but Fournier never. And his ensemble is almost such an instinct that his best realm seems to be chamber music, I think(Perhaps it is prejudice from my taste. ^^). Of course, it depends on the playing style, but isn't it minus if a cellist has problem at chamber music? His recordings are
released much as CD, and lucky in transffering. Mainly
EMI From début to mid 50s,
Decca in 50s. His most important career as recording
artist is a 'title cellist' representing DG from late 50s to late 60s,
after which he recorded freely at RCA, EMI, Erato,
Philips, and Sony. My discography includes almost all of
the so-called standard cello repertoire(though he did not
record as many comtemporaries as Rostropovich). Of course
DG is the central company, but considerable amount in
other companies Perhaps it's nothing to be desired if a great artist is also good-natured. Fournier seemed to be so. Friedrich Gulda does not resemble Fournier in any way, but Gulda played with him in about 30 concerts and recorded Beethoven's complete sonatas. He said "He was the more seasoned, and my superior. I owe him a great deal. I learnt a huge amount from him, musically, about taking things seriously, and he guided me, kindly but also very strenuously." Of no other musician does Gulda spoke with so much respect, affection and warmth as Fournier. Later, Heinrich Schiff tried to persuade gulda to join him in a new recording of the Beethoven's sonatas, but in vain. Gulda said to him, "Don't build up your hopes. I was so spoilt by Fournier that it's out of the question for me, great as it might be."
(c) 2000~, Youngrok LEE ; Link free, but please get my approval before you reuse, copy, or quote this materials Created ; 29th Aug. 2000 |