* RECORDS with ERROR ; Items
1. Beethoven
1) Complete
Symphonies(+Triple Concerto in C major, op.56)
- Felix
Weingartner(con.)/London po.(Nos.4,5), London
so.(No.2), Royal po.(No.6),
Vienna
po.(Nos.1,3,7~9)
- Recording ; 1927~38
- Grammofono 2000 AB 78012~16
- Contribution
; Hwaseop LIM, The Classical Music, No.5(July 1997)[ by courtesy of the
author ]
... It's very happy that
we can buy Weingartner's Beethoven Complete symphonies,
in case its transferring to CD is not bad. Alas, this
reissued CD by Italian Fono Enterprise is not good,
judging from the quality of CD transferring. It's never good and
do not safisfy even the least creteria to listen
it.
At least, it's almost sure that Eroica's
transferring is not directly from 78s. By characteristic
noise, the source was already transferred LP. At the
beginning of the second movement, the frequency of noise
is about 2 seconds(a little bit shorter than it), which
are totally absurd in normal transferring from 78s. I
think it was processed by CEDAR system to reduce noise
and to manipulate sound balance from LP of 33 1/3
rpm(moreover it was not at good condition). Different from notes "Transferred
from 78s or original tapes" in the jacket, there
is no possiblity that this CD has transferred from 78s(NB; this recording has no original tapes).
At the fourth movement of the 'Choral'
symphony - about playing time 11:00, there is very
strange phenomenon that it seems to be 'LP-needle jump',
and several second of playing is gone out and not audible. The CDs by Preiser(#90193) and
Pearl(#9407) have no defect at this position. I have no
choice to conclude that Alessandro Nava, who produced
this CD, is musically deaf or totally absurd man that
releases CD as he do not even hear the master tape of it.
Yoshio Okazaki, who missedited to make a 4th pause too
short in Beethoven's 5th symphony of Furtwängler,
is never comparable to A.Nava in spoiling record. (^^ NB
; the item is explained in HS-2088 page)
Though I don't consider these errors, this is the worst in the
transferred CD of Weingartner's Beethoven recordings
undoubtedly. Treble over some
level is cut and under the level is unnaturally raised,
so it made sounds dull and rough. Bass resolution is
unnaturally low and has severe humming, therefore it
totally failed to capture subtle nuances. It seems that
the reason is why he reduced noise too much and
artificially manipulated sound characteristics. In
addition, there are many points with pitch fluctuation
because perhaps the speed of turntable was not uniform. I
cannot find the delicacies Weingartner instilled into
this recordings - I felt some of them heard in
well-transferred CD - and this CD only gives grotesque
sound in bass humming...
... Even if this
5CD-set is not normally transferred but bad copy of the
former transferred LP from other company, it can have
some meanings if it's the world first release of the
recordings. But not at all, because LYS/Dante had already
released it though deleted from catalogue now.
In fact, Fono
Enterprise and LYS/Dante don't have good reputation in
transferring 78s, because they prefer to 'musical xeroxing', copying other company's
LP or CD releases. But the latter does not manipulate the
'copied' source at heavy hand, which can be good if the
original source(LP or CD) was in good state. Gramofono
2000 transferring is inferior to even that of LYS/Dante.
Anyway, this
releases cannot be made by the transferrer with the
minimum pride. Therefore, it
may be meaningless to say which is the better - but
Gramofono 2000 is surely inferior to that of even
LYS/Dante in the release date
and the sound quality. At least, even the faithful
xeroxing would give the better results than now ....
>> See ; Cortot's Chopin Ballade No.1, 'Hall of Shame'
3 Issue of Toshiba-EMI(TOCE 9285~89)
2) Complete
Violin Sonatas
- Fritz Kreisler(vn),
Franz Rupp(p)
- Recording ; 1935~36
- Naxos 8.110969~71(3
set)
- first appeared at This page(Jan.
2004)
These recordings
were only issued as CD by Pearl from now on except
Toshiba EMI. Naxos's release is deserved to be acclaimed
of course by virtue of its price, but the famous
restoration producer, Ward Marston, made a strange
mistake.
(105kb)
Listen to the
time 8:35.5~8:48.5 of sector 5(CD 3), 2nd mvt. of
Kreutzer sonata by clicking the cover image. Do you agree to my opinion
that a pause at the end of a phrase is too long? Perhaps, the editing of the two 78s disk
side change is wrong.
3) Complete
String Quartets
- Vienna
Musikverein Quartet
- Recording ; January 1990~ April 1992, Wien
- Platz PLCC-606~613(Japanese)
- Contribution
; The Classical Music, No.1(June 1996)
This
set is one of my favorites by its fluency and
well-balanced music, but has a big mistake.
In 'Grosse Fuge'(track #7 of CD #6), I
was very surprised at absurd missediting at the playing
time about 13:20. The first half of 605th bar was cut(see
score below), which can be never explained by the
difference of version, etc. As in the score, 4-notes in the dotted
line is motive of fugue theme, so there is no reason that
the half bar has to be cut. This missediting is obviously
the producer(Hiroshi Minagawa)'s error.
Of course, I do not want recording
producers to be perfect as God and understand that they
can make mistake. But can a CD like this be sold as
normal? It's delinquency of producer's duty, I think,
because he did not even inspect the master tape before
release. (Though after issue, correcting this error is
easy in modern recording technique...)
(60kb)
5 Grosser Fuge, bars 601~608
4) String
Quartet No.12 & 16
- Alban Berg Quartet
- Recording ; 1983
- EMI CDR 5 69791 2
- Contribution ; Classical Music
Forum in HiTEL, Message Board No.8,
#1259 & 1413(In Korean,
29th Sep.1997 & 13th Jan.1998)
This is very
popular item in Red line series. There is a severe flutter in
the 1st movement of No.16 in playing time 6:01~6:05, which has much instability in sound
quality, and especially distortion of 1st violin. This
item is reissue of older version(CDS 7 47135 8), and I
don't know whether it has the same problem. I wish this
problem is not due to its price grade(budget).
5) Piano
Sonatas No.23,28,30, & 31
- Solomon(p)
- Recording ; 1950s
- Testament SBT 1192(pub.
2000)
- Contribution ; This page at
first(Jan. 2004)
No.31 in this CD
is reissue of EMI CHS 7 64708 2(2 set; published on 1993)
by Testament. In EMI's set, there is a note about a
problem ;
Towards the end of the last
movement of this Sonata, there is an audible edit
which comes from the original analogue tape.
Everything possible has been done to improve this
edit, but, unfortunately, there are two notes
missing in the right hand part and these could
not be replaced.
This 2 versions
has same error; it is plausible that Testament and EMI
uses same source. However, Testament issue omitted the kind notes in
EMI's sleeve. Therefore, before
I buy EMI's release, I think Testament does not know this
error. Why did it delete this info?
(60kb)
5 Piano Sonata No.31, Fuga, bars 161~65; sector
14, 5:21.4~5:28.2(2 notes missing)
(c) 1996~ , Youngrok LEE ; Link free, but please get my approval
before you reuse, copy, or quote this materials.
Created ; 26th Dec. 1999
Last Update ; 4th Jan. 2004
5TOP
|